Jump to content

                        Please Visit Our Paid Sponsors

- - - - -

Cops Can Destroy Seized Weed, Colorado Supreme Court Rules

4 replies to this topic

#1 Tokecrazy


    Hydro Guru

  • Super Administrators
  • 6448 posts

Posted 12 March 2017 - 08:05 AM

Wednesday, January 25, 2017 at 5:56 a.m.
Going, going, gone.
Scott Lentz


For the past four years, any time local police seized cannabis in a criminal investigation, they've been required to care for it, either by keeping the plants alive or by returning the marijuana in a usable form to the owner. That's no longer the case.

On January 23, the Colorado Supreme Court ruled that requiring police to store marijuana in evidence is in violation of federal law. The court issued its opinion in the case of the People v. Robert Crouse.

Crouse, a medical marijuana patient, was arrested on May 5, 2011, on charges of cultivation and possession of marijuana after police seized 55 marijuana plants and about 2.9 kilograms of marijuana product from his home. He was charged with a felony count of cultivating more than thirty marijuana plants. Crouse asserted that he was in lawful possession of the cannabis for medical purposes, and a jury acquitted him of marijuana-related drug crimes.

After his trial, Crouse asked the court to order police to return the seized marijuana plants and, in December 2013, a district judge ruled in his favor because Colorado state law says that upon acquittal, marijuana "shall be returned immediately."

The Colorado Supreme Court.
Colorado Judicial Branch

On Monday, however, Colorado Supreme Court Judge Allison Eid wrote that whenever officers return marijuana, it's forcing them to be "distributors," which is a federal crime.

Last September, Eid was one of 21 candidates named by President Donald Trump as a potential U.S. Supreme Court nominee.

"The return provision requires law enforcement officers to return, or distribute, marijuana," she wrote in the decision. "Thus compliance with the return provision necessarily requires law enforcement officers to violate federal law."

Three justices dissented, saying the Controlled Substances Act "immunizes federal and state officers from civil and criminal liability in the circumstances at issue here." Colorado Supreme Court Judge Richard Gabriel, who wrote a dissenting opinion, said he believes it's possible to comply with both the Controlled Substances Act and Colorado state law. Justice Gabriel was joined by Chief Justice Nancy Rice and Justice William Hood in the dissent.

Under article XVIII, section 14(2)(e) of the Colorado Constitution, law enforcement officers are required to return medical marijuana once the individual is acquitted of a state drug charge. But for now, at least, it looks like federal law will trump state law.


  • Vitolo and Verwegener like this

                        Please Visit Our Paid Sponsors

#2 Suzycrmcheese


    Master Gardener

  • Seasoned Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2259 posts
  • LocationOregon

Posted 12 March 2017 - 03:37 PM

That's ridiculous reasoning!

  • Tokecrazy likes this

#3 Vitolo



  • Seasoned Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 284 posts
  • LocationThe Vapor Trail

Posted 13 March 2017 - 10:31 PM

I told of our raid from 2015 at http://www.greenpass...orner/?p=559263

We of course got no Marijuana returned to us, or Candies made from THC, and they kept all Oils.

We did get all possesions back, but they claim to have destroyed our "meds".

  • Tokecrazy and KnuckleDragger like this

#4 BikerPepe



  • Seasoned Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 710 posts
  • LocationN.E. WA.

Posted 17 March 2017 - 07:58 PM

it's not ridicules reasoning, it's horseshit and nonsense.  look up the term in websters dictionary.  returning someones personal property is not, in any way "distributing" anything.  she should be removed from the courts for twisting legal definitions to suit her own agenda.


vitolo: count yourself lucky.  I've been through busts that were thrown out of court for warrant-less searches and all property seized, both personal and documented, insured family heirlooms were sold at police auction.  no compensation given or offered.  you want it... try to sue for it back and good luck even finding a lawyer willing to take the case.

Edited by BikerPepe, 17 March 2017 - 08:01 PM.

  • Tokecrazy, KnuckleDragger and Vitolo like this

#5 Vitolo



  • Seasoned Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 284 posts
  • LocationThe Vapor Trail

Posted 17 March 2017 - 08:50 PM

vitolo: count yourself lucky.

Trust me... I thank the Universe at every turn!

  • Tokecrazy, BikerPepe and KnuckleDragger like this

Reply to this topic


0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users