Translate GreenPassion (powered by Google) 
10-02-2009, 10:53 AM
|  | anxiously waiting | | Join Date: Jul 2009 Location: Greatest City in America, MD
Posts: 300
Thanks: 329 Thanked 163 Times in 93 Posts
Rep Power: 33 | | Veg Light Cycles
I am curious as to why the current lifecycles have been chosen.
24/0 makes sense. Max amount of light.
12/12 makes sense as thats for flowering.
But where did the 18/6 staple come from? Why is the standard Veg cycle that as opposed to say 17/7, or 19/5?
Have there been any studies to show that 18/6 is the maximized day/night ratio for MJ growing or is it that 18/6 is just a nicer cycle to remember than 17/7?
| | The Following User Says Thank You to siriguejo For This Useful Post: | | 
10-02-2009, 11:20 AM
|  | Moderator | | Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 1,947
Thanks: 925 Thanked 1,513 Times in 998 Posts
Rep Power: 201 | |
But where did the 18/6 staple come from? Why is the standard Veg cycle that as opposed to say 17/7, or 19/5?
No reason I'm aware of, being a dividable number makes it easier to work with. I use 18/6 cause I think the plants like the breather... Peace. | | The Following User Says Thank You to Zigzagman For This Useful Post: | | 
10-02-2009, 12:00 PM
|  | Tokin & smokin | | Join Date: Jul 2009 Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 79
Thanks: 148 Thanked 118 Times in 47 Posts
Rep Power: 26 | |
I was always under the impression that 18 hours came from the number of hours in a 'perfect' day, like if the sun was right over head during summer solstice. 12 hours is the winter solstice.
Gross generalizations but I think that's where the numbers are coming from.
| 
10-02-2009, 12:22 PM
|  | anxiously waiting | | Join Date: Jul 2009 Location: Greatest City in America, MD
Posts: 300
Thanks: 329 Thanked 163 Times in 93 Posts
Rep Power: 33 | | Quote:
Originally Posted by Zigzagman I use 18/6 cause I think the plants like the breather... Peace. | i totally understand the breather part and am all for it...but was curious why a 6hr breather and not a 5hr or a 7hr.
simple-er math could be it....or maybe its like the optimal natural cycle closer to the tropical regions where MJ thrives...
hence the questioning ;-) | | The Following User Says Thank You to siriguejo For This Useful Post: | | 
10-14-2009, 01:18 PM
|  | anxiously waiting | | Join Date: Jul 2009 Location: Greatest City in America, MD
Posts: 300
Thanks: 329 Thanked 163 Times in 93 Posts
Rep Power: 33 | |
what about the FLoewer cycle...
12/12 is easy but is that the maximization of production? What about 13/11 or even 11/13? has anyone ever experimented with that or is there research/literature out there that states that 12/12 is better than something else?
| | The Following User Says Thank You to siriguejo For This Useful Post: | | 
10-18-2009, 03:49 PM
|  | ain't got a clue | | Join Date: Jul 2009 Location: Pacific Northwest
Posts: 66
Thanks: 34 Thanked 67 Times in 36 Posts
Rep Power: 24 | |
I'm with the dude above ......... my veggies get 24/0 .... my flowers get 12/12.
I have noticed (but was hesitant to ask) that many seem to use something other than 24/0 for the veg cycle. It would seem that anything other than 24/0 would tend to push them towards flower.
Any solid research/evidence links would be appreciated.
Thanks
Feez
| | The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Feezle For This Useful Post: | | 
10-18-2009, 05:27 PM
| | Medicine man | | Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 377
Thanks: 0 Thanked 469 Times in 232 Posts
Rep Power: 69 | |
18/6 seems to be the point where you receive the most growth per hour of light. It saves 25% on the power usage without suffering 25% slower growth. 24/0 uses more power and gives slightly more growth.
If you are trying to keep the power bill as low as possible, I like 6/6/6/6, it saves 50% on the bill versus 24/0, and if you have multiple lights you can cycle them against one another so your loss in growth is quite minimal.
If you have several thousand watts, this can be handy.
| | The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to 6951A For This Useful Post: | | 
10-18-2009, 05:44 PM
|  | Medicine man | | Join Date: Apr 2009 Location: London
Posts: 387
Thanks: 250 Thanked 416 Times in 218 Posts
Rep Power: 81 | | is it ok to put a plant into the 18/6 cycle after being in a 24/0 cycle without stressing or causing any effects ? | | The Following User Says Thank You to UkCheeseShane For This Useful Post: | | 
10-18-2009, 05:47 PM
|  | GP Design Team | | Join Date: Sep 2009 Location: Amerika
Posts: 1,077
Thanks: 1,723 Thanked 1,477 Times in 682 Posts
Rep Power: 118 | | Quote:
Originally Posted by UkCheeseShane is it ok to put a plant into the 18/6 cycle after being in a 24/0 cycle without stressing or causing any effects ? | i would ease into it. i wouldn't just instantly do it. the seasons transition slowly naturally to begin with
__________________  "Protect the children of the poor, punish the wrongdoer." "Why am I a vigilante? Because the system is f**ked." | | The Following User Says Thank You to Sprocket For This Useful Post: | | 
10-18-2009, 05:48 PM
|  | Medicine man | | Join Date: Apr 2009 Location: London
Posts: 387
Thanks: 250 Thanked 416 Times in 218 Posts
Rep Power: 81 | | yeh i can understand that , what about a 1-2 hour a night break down ease it down so over the space of like 3 days bring it into the 18/6 or do 1 hour a night and bring it down over the space of 6 days ? | | The Following User Says Thank You to UkCheeseShane For This Useful Post: | | 
10-18-2009, 05:57 PM
|  | GP Design Team | | Join Date: Sep 2009 Location: Amerika
Posts: 1,077
Thanks: 1,723 Thanked 1,477 Times in 682 Posts
Rep Power: 118 | |
i would go for the six, good things come to those who wait, after all
__________________  "Protect the children of the poor, punish the wrongdoer." "Why am I a vigilante? Because the system is f**ked." | | The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Sprocket For This Useful Post: | | 
10-18-2009, 07:35 PM
|  | Medicine man | | Join Date: Apr 2009 Location: London
Posts: 387
Thanks: 250 Thanked 416 Times in 218 Posts
Rep Power: 81 | | i might start that tonight , turn it off for 1 hour then turn it back on , tomrorow turn it off for 2 hours . etc etc till im at 18/6 , cheers for the advice sprocket | | The Following User Says Thank You to UkCheeseShane For This Useful Post: | | 
10-18-2009, 08:43 PM
|  | GP Design Team | | Join Date: Sep 2009 Location: Amerika
Posts: 1,077
Thanks: 1,723 Thanked 1,477 Times in 682 Posts
Rep Power: 118 | | Quote:
Originally Posted by UkCheeseShane i might start that tonight , turn it off for 1 hour then turn it back on , tomrorow turn it off for 2 hours . etc etc till im at 18/6 , cheers for the advice sprocket | your welcome, just sharing what i have read myself | | The Following User Says Thank You to Sprocket For This Useful Post: | | 
10-19-2009, 12:42 AM
| | Tokin & smokin | | Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 77
Thanks: 18 Thanked 45 Times in 27 Posts
Rep Power: 75 | |
Hi
My 2 cents
In my limited testing i found this to be in the Veg cycle
24/0 Bigger plants (Taller)
18/6 Smaller plants (Bigger roots) higher yield also.
I pre veg my plants in a small tray containing 5 inch net pots.
I am able to watch the progress of the plants and roots easily
Good luck
| | The Following User Says Thank You to Newfriend For This Useful Post: | | 
10-20-2009, 07:50 AM
|  | Newbie | | Join Date: Aug 2009 Location: UK... i think anyway.
Posts: 29
Thanks: 17 Thanked 59 Times in 20 Posts
Rep Power: 24 | | Quote:
Originally Posted by siriguejo what about the FLower cycle...
12/12 is easy but is that the maximization of production? What about 13/11 or even 11/13? has anyone ever experimented with that or is there research/literature out there that states that 12/12 is better than something else? |
Hey,, ive used 11on/13off before from about 2-3 weeks into flower. i didnt notice anything,, i suppose someone would have to do a side by side test with the same clones same lights etc.
All i can say is that it didnt harm the plants.
Peace.
-SBA
__________________ Current Grow.....
..Instead of taking five or six of the prescriptions, I decided to go a natural route and smoke marijuana. - Melissa Etheridge.
..I think people need to be educated to the fact that marijuana is not a drug. Marijuana is an herb and a flower. God put it here. If He put it here and He wants it to grow, what gives the government the right to say that God is wrong? - Willie Nelson | | The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to SirBudAlot For This Useful Post: | | 
10-20-2009, 08:18 PM
| | Tokin & smokin | | Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 77
Thanks: 18 Thanked 45 Times in 27 Posts
Rep Power: 75 | | Quote:
Originally Posted by siriguejo I am curious as to why the current lifecycles have been chosen.
24/0 makes sense. Max amount of light.
12/12 makes sense as thats for flowering.
But where did the 18/6 staple come from? Why is the standard Veg cycle that as opposed to say 17/7, or 19/5?
Have there been any studies to show that 18/6 is the maximized day/night ratio for MJ growing or is it that 18/6 is just a nicer cycle to remember than 17/7? | Hi Me again lol
I just can't resist showing how much I know (Or think I know)
In my short growing experience I have found that:
Longer Light in Veg say 24/00 I had taller plants less roots and less yield.
Smaller plants with 18/6 more roots larger yield.
I was growing in a rental awhile back and an inspection was scheduled in like 5 weeks.
I was told that changing the light schedual from 12/12 to 14/10 (10hrs on) would make the crop come in quicker.
I over did it and made it 8hrs on and 16 off.
Cut about 9 days off a 9 week bloom plant.
I started the 16/8 on week 3.5 of my bloom cycle.
Hope this helps
PS: The yield was way down, but got a crop and the smoke was just as good.
| | The Following User Says Thank You to Newfriend For This Useful Post: | | 
10-20-2009, 08:39 PM
| | Medicine man | | Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 377
Thanks: 0 Thanked 469 Times in 232 Posts
Rep Power: 69 | |
fast flowering is generally done using 6 hours of day, and 12 hours of night. The faster finish is created because the plant finishes in the same number of, "days" but each day is 6 hours shorter, giving you a 25% faster flower time.
You can crop out blackberry and some other fast finishers in a month with this technique, but their yield will be down.
| | The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to 6951A For This Useful Post: | | 
10-20-2009, 08:54 PM
| | Changing Focus | | Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 1,607
Thanks: 1,294 Thanked 887 Times in 578 Posts
Rep Power: 313 | |
I always liked 18/6 for veg and 12/12 for 4 weeks (or until full flower mode, not stretching so much) of flower, and then shorten the daylight times by a hour every 5 days or so. Never had much of a yield issue and not sure how much time I really shaved off. Never tried short days right out of the flowering gate.
| | The Following User Says Thank You to freetolive For This Useful Post: | | 
10-20-2009, 09:10 PM
| | Newbie | | Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 25
Thanks: 0 Thanked 18 Times in 11 Posts
Rep Power: 12 | |
In my general experience and from what I've read the reason for the 18/6 lite cycle is two fold.
The energy use/plant growth ratio is optimal at 18/6. As stated above you get the most growth with the most efficient use of your energy. Lower lite cycles will leave room for growth and more lite will cut back on your growth to wattage use.
The second reason is that the idea of a grow show indoors is to mimic an outdoor environment at it's best. The longest day of the summer is an 18 hour day, and the shortest is 12/12. That is why these times have been the standard in indoor growing.
Taken from Jorge Cervantes's Horticulture Grow Bible revised edition.
| | The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Tim Foolery For This Useful Post: | | 
10-20-2009, 10:19 PM
| | Tokin & smokin | | Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 77
Thanks: 18 Thanked 45 Times in 27 Posts
Rep Power: 75 | | Thank you thank you Quote:
Originally Posted by 6951A fast flowering is generally done using 6 hours of day, and 12 hours of night. The faster finish is created because the plant finishes in the same number of, "days" but each day is 6 hours shorter, giving you a 25% faster flower time.
You can crop out blackberry and some other fast finishers in a month with this technique, but their yield will be down. |
Many thanks
That is valuable info indeed.
I am sure it is posted elsewhere, just a matter of looking it up.
Thanks again
| | The Following User Says Thank You to Newfriend For This Useful Post: | | | Thread Tools | | | | Display Modes | Linear Mode |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | | All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:03 PM. |