View Single Post
Old 08-29-2008, 05:36 PM   #10 (permalink)
scott06
Moderator
Moderator
 
scott06's Avatar
 

Location: New England
Gallery: 29
Thanks: 614
Thanked 748 Times in 489 Posts
scott06 has a reputation beyond reputescott06 has a reputation beyond reputescott06 has a reputation beyond reputescott06 has a reputation beyond reputescott06 has a reputation beyond reputescott06 has a reputation beyond reputescott06 has a reputation beyond reputescott06 has a reputation beyond reputescott06 has a reputation beyond reputescott06 has a reputation beyond reputescott06 has a reputation beyond repute
Activity Longevity
2/20 13/20
Today Posts
0/0 sssss1390
Default

it does make sense....HID lighting is well Higher Intensity and so tends to penetrate more deeply and create bigger buds...so comparing cfl and hid lumens can be like comparing apples and oranges as you correctly point out. lumenousity can be only accuratly measured with a light meter at the spot you want the light regaurdless of what the manufacturer prints on the bulb...but the guidlines for cfl lumens on the canopy have worked very well and are very good way of calculating if you have enough light...I always figure if I go into a thread thinking the exact same thing when I go out of it, then I haven't learned anything..so I don't think of as a debate (most ardent debaters can win arguments, but that doesn't mean they are correct) but rather dialogue and perhaps at most deliberation
scott06 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to scott06 For This Useful Post:
jangel (08-29-2008), kailiwela44 (09-02-2008)