View Single Post
Old 01-07-2008, 03:36 PM   #9 (permalink)
green_nobody
Moderator
Moderator
 
green_nobody's Avatar
 

Location: out on the farm
Gallery: 0
Thanks: 157
Thanked 646 Times in 451 Posts
green_nobody has a reputation beyond reputegreen_nobody has a reputation beyond reputegreen_nobody has a reputation beyond reputegreen_nobody has a reputation beyond reputegreen_nobody has a reputation beyond reputegreen_nobody has a reputation beyond reputegreen_nobody has a reputation beyond reputegreen_nobody has a reputation beyond reputegreen_nobody has a reputation beyond reputegreen_nobody has a reputation beyond reputegreen_nobody has a reputation beyond repute
Activity Longevity
12/20 20/20
Today Posts
0/0 sssss4358
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by OldFart View Post
i agree on that,
but the thing is -
high power LEDs produce 75-80 lum/W
and that all is usable light
while with hps and other more powerfull lights
you use only a fraction of what the plant really need.
here's the research report from the source
you can trust - US department of energy =o)
Solid-State Lighting: Research Highlights
these high power LEDs get mighty hot, so the need a active cooling system to run - and what gets so hot causes new trouble. and high end LEDs rate with 25000 to 50000h, the cost couple times more then a HPS, get less out in lumen and create you a complete new heat problem - besides that they hardly run as long as 2 HPS bulbs will do for a fraction. and that they produce so much more usable light, well that is already so... that the mythbusters should take care of that sorry

in my view those things aren't ready to do the task today, they will do it in a few years for sure but today it would be money well wasted.
__________________
Keep the gun oiled and the thumb green!

http://www.pch.gc.ca/progs/cpsc-ccsp...Canada-eng.MP3

green_nobody is offline   Reply With Quote