View Single Post
Old 12-22-2007, 08:40 PM   #6 (permalink)
green_nobody
Moderator
Moderator
 
green_nobody's Avatar
 

Location: out on the farm
Gallery: 0
Thanks: 156
Thanked 641 Times in 449 Posts
green_nobody has a reputation beyond reputegreen_nobody has a reputation beyond reputegreen_nobody has a reputation beyond reputegreen_nobody has a reputation beyond reputegreen_nobody has a reputation beyond reputegreen_nobody has a reputation beyond reputegreen_nobody has a reputation beyond reputegreen_nobody has a reputation beyond reputegreen_nobody has a reputation beyond reputegreen_nobody has a reputation beyond reputegreen_nobody has a reputation beyond repute
Activity Longevity
12/20 20/20
Today Posts
0/0 sssss4350
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by videoman View Post
I think this is another myth that should be over come.
I don't believe cfl's produce less heat at all.
A watt is a watt.
When you produce/use a watt of electricity, heat is produced.

The benefit of using CFL's is that most growers simply use less watts than if they used there HID light.

i would be bit careful, a damn good CFL gets about 100 lum/W but a HPS gets 150 lum/W (as long it is bigger then 399W ) and a 400W can be use at less the 4" if aircooled and only a ft if un-cooled. you can't beat that with a 100lum/W CFL 2" away from the plant - there aren't enough lumen lost on that way and HPS wins.

and that CFLs are totally cold is a myst as well, the get so hot you can burn yourself touching one. and so they can burn, and will so, leafs too.
__________________
Keep the gun oiled and the thumb green!

http://www.pch.gc.ca/progs/cpsc-ccsp...Canada-eng.MP3

green_nobody is offline   Reply With Quote